Friday, February 09, 2007

An Inconvenient Utility Bill

After watching the Academy Awards on Sunday night I coined a new term to describe the way in which the stars fawned over Al Gore: Goreship. The adoration heeped upon Gore during the show by the likes of Melissa Etheridge and Leo DeCaprio was just creepy. The entire audience broke out in rapturous applause as he collected the Oscar for Documentary Feature for his film An Inconvenient Truth acting as though they were being visited by a demi-Gore. And the Goracle of Global Warming (coined by Captain Ed) even had coattails--Etheridge's insipid song in Truth beat out far superior tunes from the movie Dreamgirls for the Oscar in the Music (Song) category, an act reminiscent of the Grammy's Jethro Tull Moment.

It's irritating when pampered stars, who travel by private jet and stretch limo, lecture others about how they should live. Even Al Gore apparently doesn't follow his own advice.
Gore’s mansion, located in the poseh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).

In his documentary, the former Vice President calls on Americans to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home. The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.

Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh—guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore’s average monthly electric bill topped $1,359. Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Gore’s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006.
UPDATE: Al Gore has responded via Think Progress:
1) Gore’s family has taken numerous steps to reduce the carbon footprint of their private residence, including signing up for 100 percent green power through Green Power Switch, installing solar panels, and using compact fluorescent bulbs and other energy saving technology.

2) Gore has had a consistent position of purchasing carbon offsets to offset the family’s carbon footprint — a concept the right-wing fails to understand. Gore’s office explains:

What Mr. Gore has asked is that every family calculate their carbon footprint and try to reduce it as much as possible. Once they have done so, he then advocates that they purchase offsets, as the Gore’s do, to bring their footprint down to zero.

I think Captain Ed has it right:

Interesting that he doesn't dispute the numbers; he just tries a little misdirection instead.

First, the solar panels and the compact fluorescent light bulbs will certainly make a difference -- but the TCPR report looks at his electricity bill, which still indicates (a) a high level of usage, and (b) an increase since the movie's release. Solar panels generate electricity at the location, which should then decrease the amount of power he's buying from the utility. If it's still going up, there seems to be a serious management problem somewhere.

Second, as I mentioned above, purchasing offsets only means that Gore doesn't want to make the same kind of sacrifices that he's asking other families to make. He's using a modern form of indulgences in order to avoid doing the penance that global-warming activism demands of others. It means that the very rich can continue to suck up energy and raise the price and the demand for electricity and natural gas, while families struggle with their energy costs and face increasing government regulation and taxation. It's a regressive plan that Gore's supporters would decry if the same kind of scheme were applied to a national sales tax, for instance. (italics mine)

And basically, it doesn't address the issue of hypocrisy. If Gore and his family continue to increase their consumption of commercial energy with all of the resources they have at hand, then they have no business lecturing the rest of us on conservation and down-scaling our own use. (via The Anchoress)

Amen.

2 comments:

Dayray said...

Showgirls? I think you meant Dreamgirls! There's a big difference between soft porn and a musical!

LTA said...

Ahh!. Good catch, Dara. a major "doh!". I'll have to correct it.